What problem does it solve? Researchers often receive vague or surface-level feedback on drafts of papers, thesis chapters, reports, and academic emails, making it hard to identify blocking flaws, weak claims, or logical gaps before submission. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured 2+2 Review: Delivers two specific strengths and two structural or logical improvement areas, with blocking flaws surfaced first when they could justify rejection. - Claim and Consistency Audit: Inspects headline claims, contribution statements, numeric consistency across prose, tables, and figures, and limitation visibility, with specialized checks for power systems, optimization, VPP scheduling, MCTS, MPC, and uncertainty-aware control. - Bilingual Korean-English Advising: Responds in Korean or English based on user input while preserving technical notation, units, and citations. - Use Case: A graduate student pastes a conference paper draft and receives a blocking-issue diagnosis, anchored improvement points, and a minimal ordered revision plan without the Skill ghostwriting the manuscript. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review your paper draft, thesis chapter, report, or academic email and provide two strengths, two major weaknesses, and a revision plan.
