What problem does it solve? Researchers often submit papers with structural gaps, unsupported claims, missing citations, or unclear figures that lead to desk rejections or major revisions. This Skill provides a systematic self-review checklist to catch these issues before submission. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structure and Logic Review: Checks that abstract, introduction, method, results, and discussion are complete, reproducible, and logically coherent. - Research Claim Audit: Verifies each major claim is supported by results, citations, or analysis artifacts, and flags overclaiming with a keep/weaken/revise/remove verdict. - Citation and Figure Quality Checks: Validates citation completeness and accuracy, and evaluates figure/table captions, readability, and format compliance. - Use Case: Before submitting a conference paper, run a full self-review to get a verdict (ready with minor edits, needs moderate revision, or not ready) plus the top blocking and polish issues. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to self-review your paper draft for structure, claim support, citations, and figure quality before submission.
