repo-eval

Coordinate multi-agent codebase evaluations and generate remediation reports.

Updated Feb 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor --skill repo-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: repo-eval
Source: https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor/tree/main/.claude/skills/repo-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HatmanStack/news-investor --skill repo-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the comprehensive evaluation of a codebase against defined role levels, identifying areas for improvement and remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Evaluation: Leverages three distinct AI agents (Pragmatist, Oncall Engineer, Team Lead) to assess a codebase from different perspectives.
  • Scoping and Customization: Gathers user input on role level, focus areas, and specific concerns to tailor the evaluation.
  • Detailed Reporting: Generates a consolidated evaluation document (eval.md) outlining scores, remediation targets, and detailed feedback from each agent.
  • Use Case: A hiring manager can use this Skill to objectively assess a candidate's take-home project against a Senior Developer benchmark, receiving a detailed report on code quality, architecture, and maintainability.

Quick Start

Use the repo-eval skill to evaluate the current codebase for a Mid-Level Developer role.

Frequently Asked Questions about repo-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a codebase for a specific developer role level?▼

You can evaluate a codebase by scoping the assessment against a defined role level, such as a Senior Developer benchmark, to generate a detailed remediation report on code quality and architecture. The system coordinates specialized agents to assess the project from different perspectives.

What is the best way to assess a candidate's take-home project objectively?▼

Assessing a take-home project objectively involves running parallel specialized evaluator agents that analyze code quality, architecture, and maintainability against a customized benchmark. This generates a consolidated document with scores and detailed feedback from multiple engineering perspectives.

Can I customize code review evaluations to focus on specific architectural concerns?▼

Yes, code review evaluations can be customized by gathering user input on specific focus areas and concerns before the assessment begins. This scoping process tailors the multi-agent evaluation to target the exact architectural or maintainability issues you need to analyze.

How does multi-agent code evaluation work for hiring assessments?▼

Multi-agent code evaluation works by deploying three distinct AI personas—a Pragmatist, an Oncall Engineer, and a Team Lead—to assess a codebase in parallel. Their individual findings are consolidated into a structured markdown document with scores and remediation targets.

What format does the codebase evaluation report use?▼

The codebase evaluation report is generated as a structured markdown document named eval.md. This file consolidates the findings from all parallel evaluator agents, providing detailed scores, remediation targets, and specific feedback for hiring or maintenance purposes.