code-review

Automate multi-perspective code reviews with structured checklists and workflow prompts.

370|33|Updated Dec 14, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit --skill code-review-nth5693
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kit --skill code-review-nth5693

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams enforce consistent, high-quality code reviews by providing structured checklists and procedures that guide reviewers through multiple perspectives.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-Review: Before submitting a PR or finishing a task, run an internal quality pass to catch issues early.
  • Peer Review: When reviewing another agent's or teammate's code (e.g., /resolve_pr), apply standardized checks to ensure consistency.
  • Plan Review: Validate implementation plans and architecture decisions against project standards.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to apply predefined quality gates during reviews. Start with a self-check before PR submission, then perform a peer review with the provided workflows and checklists.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce consistent quality gates during a pull request code review?▼

Automated code review applies predefined quality gates and structured checklists to enforce consistent peer review, self-review, and plan validation standards across pull requests.

What is the best way to automate a self-review checklist before submitting a PR?▼

Automating a self-review checklist before submitting a PR involves running an internal quality pass with predefined workflows to catch issues early and validate implementation against project standards.

How do I validate implementation plans and architecture decisions against project standards?▼

You validate implementation plans and architecture decisions by applying a multi-perspective plan review process that checks proposed designs against standardized project quality gates and checklists.

Can I use static analysis automation for peer review without configuring dependencies?▼

Yes, you can apply automated static analysis procedures for peer review directly, as this approach requires no external dependencies to guide reviewers through standardized quality checks.

When should I use an automated quality checklist instead of manual code review?▼

You should use an automated quality checklist when you need to streamline multi-perspective code reviews and enforce consistent quality gates across multiple reviewers without relying on manual oversight.