RedTeam

Deploy 32 agents to critique and counter-argue proposals.

1|Updated Jan 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/verrio1/vaughn-pai --skill redteam-verrio1
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RedTeam
Source: https://github.com/verrio1/vaughn-pai/tree/main/skills/RedTeam
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/verrio1/vaughn-pai --skill redteam-verrio1

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides rigorous adversarial analysis by deploying 32 expert-focused agents to critique, deconstruct, and counter-argue ideas, ensuring robust decision-making.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 32-agent parallel critique: 8 engineers, 8 architects, 8 pentesters, 8 interns, each offering unique angles.
  • 24-claim decomposition + 5-phase protocol: Breaks arguments into atomic parts and yields steelman + counter-argument.
  • FirstPrinciples integration: Leverages FirstPrinciples/Deconstruct and FirstPrinciples/Challenge to surface assumptions.
  • Output formats: Steelman and 8-point counter-argument, plus synthesis when needed.
  • Use cases: Evaluate architecture proposals, policy changes, or strategic plans with rigorous adversarial scrutiny.

Quick Start

Provide the argument you want analyzed and choose a workflow (ParallelAnalysis or AdversarialValidation) to run.

Frequently Asked Questions about RedTeam

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test an architecture proposal using adversarial analysis?▼

To stress-test an architecture proposal, provide your argument to the system and choose a ParallelAnalysis or AdversarialValidation workflow. The 32-agent system then executes a 5-phase protocol to break your argument into atomic parts, outputting both a steelman and an 8-point counter-argument for rigorous adversarial validation.

What is the best way to generate a steelman and counter-argument for a strategic plan?▼

The best way to generate a steelman and counter-argument is using a 24-claim decomposition protocol that breaks strategic plans into atomic parts. This approach yields a structured 8-point counter-argument by leveraging FirstPrinciples integration to deeply examine foundational constraints and surface hidden assumptions.

Can I evaluate policy changes using parallel analysis from multiple expert perspectives?▼

Yes, you can evaluate policy changes using parallel analysis by deploying 32 expert-focused agents across 8 engineers, 8 architects, 8 pentesters, and 8 interns. Each persona offers a unique critique angle, ensuring your policy changes undergo rigorous adversarial scrutiny from diverse professional viewpoints.

Does this adversarial analysis tool integrate with FirstPrinciples for examining assumptions?▼

Yes, the adversarial analysis directly integrates with FirstPrinciples tools, leveraging FirstPrinciples/Deconstruct and FirstPrinciples/Challenge to surface and examine foundational assumptions. This integration allows for deeper constraint examination during the 5-phase parallel analysis of your proposals and strategic decisions.

What are the limitations of using automated agents for counter-argument generation?▼

The primary limitation of using automated agents for counter-argument generation is that the critique quality depends entirely on the initial argument provided. While the 32 agents execute a structured 5-phase protocol, they cannot verify external real-world viability, meaning human synthesis is still required for final strategic decisions.