What problem does it solve? Product managers often struggle to choose the right prioritization method or apply frameworks like RICE and ICE inconsistently, leading to feature-driven roadmaps instead of problem-driven ones. This reference guide provides formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates for nine prioritization frameworks so teams prioritize customer problems rather than solutions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Nine Frameworks Compared: Covers Opportunity Score, ICE, RICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Eisenhower Matrix, Impact vs Effort, Risk vs Reward, and Weighted Decision Matrix with best-fit scenarios for each. - Formulas and Scoring Guidance: Provides exact formulas such as Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction) and RICE = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort, with normalization instructions. - Ready-to-Use Templates: Links to Google Sheets templates for ICE and RICE scoring and a Google Slides template for Importance vs Satisfaction surveys. - Use Case: A PM debating RICE vs ICE for a quarterly roadmap can consult the comparison table, learn that RICE adds Reach for larger teams needing granularity, and open the linked spreadsheet template to score initiatives immediately. ## Quick Start Ask which prioritization framework fits your situation, for example whether to use RICE or ICE for scoring a backlog of feature ideas.
