me-3

Score engineering payloads on completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-3
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: me-3
Source: https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow/tree/main/c1.5/.claude/skills/me-3
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-3

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This ME-3 checkpoint defines a formal exit-scoring mechanism for the L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD, enabling objective assessment of payload readiness by quantifying four dimensions: Completeness, Clarity, Accuracy, and Implementability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 4-dimension ME-3 scoring: evaluates P, C, A, and I to produce a single composite score.
  • Calibration anchors: provides explicit criteria and examples to ensure consistent scoring across teams.
  • HB Validation Gate integration: projects post-score status and gates further actions based on score thresholds.
  • Use Case: engineering teams can score payloads during B3 exit reviews to decide on release readiness.

Quick Start

Apply the ME-3 scoring model to the B3 exit of L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD using P, C, A, and I, and compare results against the HB Validation Gate.

Frequently Asked Questions about me-3

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I score engineering payload readiness before release?▼

Score engineering payload readiness using the ME-3 model across four dimensions: Completeness, Clarity, Accuracy, and Implementability. This mechanism produces a single composite score to objectively assess readiness during B3 exit reviews.

What is payload exit scoring for quality assurance?▼

Payload exit scoring is a formal checkpoint mechanism that quantifies payload readiness through the ME-3 model. It evaluates four dimensions and applies calibration anchors to ensure consistent and objective quality assessments across engineering teams.

How do I apply calibration anchors for consistent payload scoring?▼

Apply calibration anchors by comparing your payload assessments against explicit criteria and examples provided by the ME-3 model. This ensures consistent scoring across teams by standardizing the evaluation of completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

How does the HB validation gate work with payload scoring?▼

The HB validation gate works by projecting post-score status and gating further actions based on score thresholds. After applying the ME-3 scoring model, the gate determines whether the engineering payload satisfies the required validation criteria for release.

Can I use this scoring model for B3 exit reviews?▼

Yes, you can use the ME-3 scoring model for B3 exit reviews to evaluate the L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD. It enables engineering teams to decide on release readiness by quantifying completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

When do I need a formal exit-scoring mechanism for engineering payloads?▼

You need a formal exit-scoring mechanism when objective assessment of payload readiness is required before release. The ME-3 checkpoint quantifies four quality dimensions and applies an HB validation gate to ensure assessments meet end-to-end engineering standards.