composite-scorer

Apply weighted composite scoring to evaluate artifacts and generate scores, grades, readiness flags, and prioritized actions.

4|1|Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AreteDriver/ai-skills --skill composite-scorer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: composite-scorer
Source: https://github.com/AreteDriver/ai-skills/tree/main/personas/engineering/composite-scorer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AreteDriver/ai-skills --skill composite-scorer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a standardized, reproducible method for evaluating any artifact (code, content, infrastructure) using weighted category sub-scores, resulting in a clear composite score, grade, and prioritized action list.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Weighted Scoring: Assign importance to different evaluation criteria.
  • Categorization: Break down complex assessments into measurable sub-scores.
  • Grading & Readiness: Assign letter grades (A-F) and determine readiness for deployment or release.
  • Prioritized Actions: Generate a list of actionable steps, ranked by impact.
  • Use Case: Evaluate a new software feature against criteria like correctness, security, and performance, receiving a score, grade, and a list of critical fixes needed before release.

Quick Start

Use the composite-scorer skill to evaluate the attached code against correctness, security, and maintainability criteria, with weights 0.4, 0.3, and 0.3 respectively.

Frequently Asked Questions about composite-scorer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I calculate a weighted composite score for software readiness assessment?▼

Weighted composite scoring evaluates artifacts by assigning importance weights to defined categories, calculating sub-scores, and aggregating them into a 0-100 score with a letter grade, readiness flag, and prioritized action list.

Can I use a decision matrix to generate a letter grade for code quality assessment?▼

Defining a decision matrix with weighted categories like maintainability and performance allows the assessment to produce a standardized 0-100 score, an A-F letter grade, a readiness flag, and a prioritized action list.

How do I evaluate infrastructure readiness using performance metrics and categorization?▼

Evaluating infrastructure readiness involves breaking down performance metrics into measurable weighted sub-scores across defined categories, yielding a standardized JSON output contract with a 0-100 score, readiness flag, and prioritized actions.

Does composite scoring support reproducible quality assessment across different artifact types?▼

Composite scoring ensures reproducible quality assessment across code, content, and infrastructure artifacts by utilizing a standardized JSON output contract that consistently generates 0-100 scores, letter grades, and prioritized action lists.

What is the best way to prioritize action lists for deployment readiness flags?▼

Prioritizing action lists for deployment readiness flags involves ranking actionable steps by their impact on weighted category sub-scores, ensuring critical fixes are resolved before release based on the generated 0-100 composite score.