humanizer

Enforces confident, impact-driven tone and voice rules for Connect performance review drafts.

2|Updated Apr 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/EirikHaughom/msconnect-agent --skill humanizer-eirikhaughom
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: humanizer
Source: https://github.com/EirikHaughom/msconnect-agent/tree/main/.github/skills/humanizer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EirikHaughom/msconnect-agent --skill humanizer-eirikhaughom

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Performance review drafts often sound corporate-hollow, vague, or passive, weakening the impact of real accomplishments. This Skill enforces a consistent, authentic voice for Microsoft Connect form text so results, setbacks, goals, and actions read as confident and specific. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Tone Enforcement: Applies 10 writing patterns covering impact-first bullets, active first-person voice, quantified results, and honest setbacks. - Anti-Pattern Detection: Flags corporate jargon, passive voice, vague impact claims, defensive setbacks, and generic goals. - Concrete Examples: Provides before/after style examples for results bullets, setbacks, goals, and action statements. - Use Case: When drafting Connect form text with the connect-writer skill, apply these rules to transform "Worked on pipeline generation" into "Drove $2M pipeline by onboarding 3 priority ISVs." ## Quick Start Ask the agent to review my Connect draft and rewrite it with confident, impact-driven language following the humanizer guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions about humanizer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make my performance review sound more confident?▼

Lead every bullet with the impact or outcome rather than the activity, use active first-person voice, and quantify results inline. Replace phrases like "helped improve" with direct statements such as "Delivered 28% ACR growth."

How to write setbacks in a performance review without sounding negative?▼

Own the setback directly, show what you learned, and describe the corrective action you took. Avoid defensive framing or self-deprecation; structure it as situation, adaptation, and forward-looking result.

What are common mistakes in self-review writing?▼

Common anti-patterns include passive voice, activity framing like counting meetings attended, vague impact claims, culture checkbox statements without examples, and repetitive "I" openers. This Skill lists 13 specific anti-patterns to avoid.

Does this writing guidance work outside Microsoft Connect reviews?▼

The patterns are tuned for Connect form fields and reference Microsoft-specific concepts like core priorities and culture behaviors. The general principles of impact-first, quantified writing transfer to other review formats, but examples are Connect-specific.

When should the humanizer skill be applied in the drafting workflow?▼

Apply it whenever drafting or refining Connect form text, including results, setbacks, goals, and actions. It is designed to run alongside the connect-writer skill, which produces the initial draft content.