design-quality-reviewer

Review design outputs against design.md specifications, brand systems, and publishing checklists.

2|Updated Jun 19, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Prat05devs/dapper-city-threads --skill design-quality-reviewer-prat05devs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-quality-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Prat05devs/dapper-city-threads/tree/main/.agent/skills/design-quality-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Prat05devs/dapper-city-threads --skill design-quality-reviewer-prat05devs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Design and brand work often ships without a consistent quality gate, leading to outputs that drift from the documented design system, contain unapproved claims, or fail platform and accessibility requirements. This Skill acts as a strict review gate that checks creative outputs against the project's design.md before approval. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Gate Review: Evaluates outputs across source traceability, strategy, brand behavior, voice, system tokens, visual quality, platform correctness, motion, and claims gates. - Claim Verification: Flags unapproved dates, sponsors, partners, statistics, awards, and legal or public promises before publishing. - Publishing Checklist: Applies a 16-point checklist covering message clarity, hierarchy, readability, format, accessibility, and CTA, then lists fixes by severity when output fails. - Use Case: Before shipping a poster, carousel, website, deck, or video, run the review to confirm the output traces to the current design.md, follows token and typography rules, and contains no unverified claims. ## Quick Start Review this landing page design against our project design.md and list any failures by severity before we ship it.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-quality-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a design against a design system before shipping?▼

Run the review gate with the output and the project design.md as inputs. The Skill checks traceability, strategy, brand behavior, tokens, visual quality, platform fit, motion, and claims, then lists failures by severity instead of approving flawed work.

What happens if design.md is missing for a brand project?▼

The review does not approve the output. It returns the work to the master or context architect to create or update design.md first, since brand and design-system outputs must be traceable to a canonical source.

What types of creative outputs can this review process check?▼

It covers posters, carousels, websites, decks, videos, print assets, and brand standards. Each output is evaluated for ratio, safe areas, readability, export format, and responsiveness where relevant.

Does the review check for unapproved marketing claims?▼

Yes, the claim gate flags unapproved dates, speakers, sponsors, partners, government or institutional claims, awards, rankings, statistics, and legal or public promises before anything is published.

What are the limitations of this design review approach?▼

It is a checklist-driven qualitative review, not an automated visual regression or pixel-diff tool. It depends on an accurate, current design.md and cannot verify factual claims against external sources on its own.