brand-content-review

Provide the content, its channel, audience, locale, and your approved brand guidelines or claim library. The review checks brand voice, factual claims, legal flags, accessibility, and channel constraints, then returns severity-ranked findings with a Ready, Ready with fixes, or Blocked recommendation.

Each claim is logged in a claim check table with its type, source, scope, approval status, and expiry. Superlatives, comparisons, customer results, pricing, and compliance statements require a direct source; unsupported claims must be removed, qualified, replaced, or routed for approval.

No. The review identifies and routes legal, privacy, trademark, and regulatory flags to the appropriate approvers with exact text, jurisdiction, and proposed fixes. It never declares final legal approval or marks content as formally approved.

The review switches to a general quality review covering clarity, grammar, and structure, and explicitly states it is not a brand-compliance review. It never fabricates guidelines or claims brand compliance without an authoritative baseline.

Yes. It checks heading hierarchy, alt text, captions, plain language, and inclusive wording, plus channel-specific limits like subject lines, ad-to-landing message match, and unsubscribe links. Items it cannot verify visually are flagged as requiring visual or platform QA.

Do not use it to create a brand system from scratch, write original content, or publish directly. Those tasks belong to brand strategy, content creation, or publishing workflows; this review is strictly read-only and advisory.