decide

Run three-agent debates to produce a binding consensus document.

19|3|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness --skill decide-dirien
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decide
Source: https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/tree/main/.claude/skills/decide
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness --skill decide-dirien

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, tri-agent debate framework to surface arguments, identify gaps, and reach a defensible binding decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial steelman: Two advocates present opposing positions with strong, well-supported reasoning.
  • Moderator synthesis: A moderator identifies risks, questions, and consolidates a binding consensus.
  • Phase-driven workflow: Phases for research, round one position papers, round two convergence, and final consensus.
  • Use cases: Effective for high-stakes decisions, tradeoff analysis, and risk mitigation planning in product, architecture, or strategy contexts.

Quick Start

Provide a decision topic and supporting context, then run Phase 1 to generate position papers.

Frequently Asked Questions about decide

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use structured dialogue to make a high-stakes architecture decision?▼

Structured dialogue for architecture decisions uses a tri-agent debate framework with adversarial steelman arguments to surface risks and synthesize a binding consensus document.

What is the best way to run a risk assessment debate for product strategy?▼

Risk assessment debates for product strategy run through phase-driven workflows where two advocates present opposing positions and a moderator consolidates the final consensus.

Can I use a multi-agent debate to resolve policy design tradeoffs?▼

Multi-agent debate resolves policy design tradeoffs by applying iterative convergence steps, where a moderator identifies gaps and questions to reach a defensible decision.

How do I start a tri-agent debate for tradeoff analysis?▼

Start tri-agent tradeoff analysis by providing a decision topic and supporting context to trigger Phase 1, which generates initial position papers for the debate.

When do I need an adversarial debate framework for decision-making?▼

Adversarial debate frameworks are needed for decision-making scenarios requiring structured argumentation and risk mitigation, such as evaluating high-stakes product strategy or architecture choices.

What are the limitations of using a moderator synthesis for consensus building?▼

Moderator synthesis for consensus building is limited to decision topics requiring structured argumentation, meaning it may not suit unstructured problems lacking clear opposing positions for iterative convergence.