skills.rest
mrsonord2240
mrsonord2240COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

author-response-builder

Converts reviewer comments into structured point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions.

Updated Sep 15, 2026
Search Tags:#academic writing#biomedical research#peer review#rebuttal letter#manuscript revision#reviewer response#point-by-point
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mrsonord2240/openscience-specialists --skill author-response-builder-mrsonord2240
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: author-response-builder
Source: https://github.com/mrsonord2240/openscience-specialists/tree/main/specialists/manuscript-revision-specialist/versions/1.0.0/package/skills/author-response-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mrsonord2240/openscience-specialists --skill author-response-builder-mrsonord2240

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Responding to peer review is high-stakes: vague, defensive, or overpromising replies increase rejection risk. This Skill turns reviewer and editor comments into disciplined, professional point-by-point responses that are explicitly tied to actual manuscript changes, without fabricating revisions or hiding unresolved issues. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Response Mode Classification: Routes each comment to acceptance, explanation, rebuttal, or additional-analysis response, with a mode-distribution summary for complex reviews. - Revision Linkage: Maps every reply to concrete manuscript edits, figure or table changes, supplementary additions, or transparent limitation statements. - Unresolved Issue Handling: Distinguishes completed changes from partial responses and unresolved limits, keeping the response credible. - Use Case: After receiving a major revision decision with 12 reviewer comments, paste the comments and your revision notes to get a structured 8-section response package with per-comment replies, tone risk warnings, and framing rationale. ## Quick Start Draft point-by-point responses to these reviewer comments based on the manuscript revisions I describe.

Frequently Asked Questions about author-response-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write point-by-point responses to reviewer comments?▼

Provide the reviewer comments along with what you actually changed in the manuscript. Each comment is classified as acceptance, explanation, rebuttal, or additional-analysis, then drafted into a reply that explicitly references the corresponding manuscript revision.

How should I respond to a reviewer comment I only partially addressed?▼

State what was feasible, what remains limited, and how the manuscript now reflects that limitation. A transparent partial response is stronger than pretending the issue was fully resolved, and the reply should never conceal unresolved weaknesses.

Can I draft reviewer responses before finishing my manuscript revisions?▼

Yes, provisional responses can be drafted for revisions you can already describe, with revision-linkage text confirmed once changes are complete. The response will not fabricate completed analyses, figures, or edits that have not been done.

When should I rebut a reviewer comment instead of accepting it?▼

Rebut only when clarification or revision cannot resolve the issue more credibly, and keep the disagreement evidence-based and proportionate. Dismissive responses are avoided because editors often interpret them as author inflexibility and rule in favor of the reviewer.

What information do I need before drafting a response to reviewers?▼

You need the reviewer comments, any editor decision letter, your revision strategy, and a clear account of what was and was not changed. If these are incomplete, the drafting pauses and asks for the missing review package first.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Galaxy-DawnGalaxy-Dawn
5.3k

nature-response

Drafts and audits point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions.

Community
Advanced
AlexenderSokolovAlexenderSokolov
2

nature-response

Draft and audit point-by-point reviewer response letters and revision cover letters.

Community
Advanced
pnewsampnewsam
1

address-review

Triage and resolve inbound GitHub PR review comments with batched fixes and replies.

Community
Intermediate
MoxyWolfLLCMoxyWolfLLC

academic-perspective-builder

Define an academic writing strategy and generate perspective.json with sub-themes.

Official
Intermediate