What problem does it solve? Responding to journal reviewer comments requires tracking every editor instruction and reviewer concern, mapping each to a verified manuscript change, and maintaining a professional tone—while avoiding fabricated results, invented line numbers, or defensive language that can sink a revision. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Point-by-Point Response Drafting: Parses editor decision letters and reviewer reports into stable IDs (E.1, R1.1, R2.3), classifies each comment by severity and action, and drafts formal English responses with traceable manuscript locations. - Rebuttal Audit & Triage: Reviews existing rebuttal drafts for missed replies, defensive tone, unsupported claims, and unverified completion status, with per-item trackers and package readiness states (ready_to_submit, draft_with_placeholders, needs_author_input, blocked). - LaTeX Revision Packages: Generates cover letters, response-to-reviewers documents, and red-marked manuscript templates with visible placeholders for missing facts. - Use Case: Paste an editor's major-revision email with reviewer comments and your change notes; receive a strategy summary, comment-response tracker, draft response letter, and a list of missing evidence you must supply before submission. ## Quick Start Use the nature-response skill to turn this editor decision letter and reviewer comments into a point-by-point response draft with a readiness tracker.
