zenigame-codex-review

Automate Codex review calls via codex-vscode with frontmatter-driven safety rules.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-codex-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: zenigame-codex-review
Source: https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx/tree/main/.claude/skills/_archived/zenigame-codex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-codex-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Codex-based analyses often suffer from inconsistent prompts, unsafe prompt usage, and audit friction. This skill provides a standardized framework and frontmatter-driven rules to orchestrate Codex reviews, enforce mission constraints, and manage session state.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a central mission with explicit restrictions to prevent prompt injection and unsafe behavior.
  • Supports both one-shot and session-based review modes for iterative refinement.
  • Enables auditing by preserving prompts, reasoning traces, and decision logs for governance.

Quick Start

Invoke codex-vscode with the provided prompt structure to start a safe Codex review session.

Frequently Asked Questions about zenigame-codex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate Codex review sessions with consistent prompt safety?▼

Automate Codex review sessions by applying standardized frontmatter rules that enforce mission constraints and prevent prompt injection. This orchestrates codex-vscode calls, restricts file writes, and guides the Codex within predefined safeguards for consistent, safe analysis.

What is the best way to prevent prompt injection during code analysis?▼

Prevent prompt injection during code analysis by enforcing a central mission with explicit restrictions. This framework requires explicit frontmatter info to constrain behavior, restricts unsafe file writes, and standardizes prompts to block injection attempts.

How do I audit Codex reasoning traces and prompts for governance?▼

Audit Codex reasoning traces and prompts by preserving session state, decision logs, and analysis prompts. This skill enables governance by maintaining an auditable record of reasoning traces and frontmatter-driven constraints across iterative review modes.

Can I use codex-vscode for iterative session-based code reviews?▼

Yes, you can use codex-vscode for iterative session-based code reviews. This framework supports both one-shot and session-based review modes, allowing iterative refinement while maintaining safety rules, mission constraints, and auditability throughout the session.

Why does my Codex analysis output suffer from inconsistent prompt framing?▼

Codex analysis output suffers from inconsistent prompt framing due to unmanaged prompt usage. Applying a standardized orchestration framework with explicit frontmatter-driven rules ensures consistent framing, enforces mission constraints, and eliminates unsafe prompt variations.