ywc-impl-review

Execute parallel multi-agent conformance reviews across architecture, design, security, and QA domains.

8|1|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit --skill ywc-impl-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ywc-impl-review
Source: https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit/tree/main/claude-code/skills/ywc-impl-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit --skill ywc-impl-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python3, gh, uv, ripgrep, and includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the gap between code completion and PR creation by performing a rigorous, multi-dimensional conformance review, ensuring that implementation aligns with specifications and quality standards before human review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-Axis Verification: Simultaneously evaluates Architecture, Design, Devex, Security, and QA using specialized subagents.
  • Two-Phase Advisor Pattern: Uses Sonnet/Haiku for mechanical checks and escalates only ambiguous findings to an Opus advisor to maximize frontier model efficiency.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a complex backend API PR, run this skill to catch structural boundary violations, OWASP security risks, and missing test cases that would otherwise block the merge.

Quick Start

Run the ywc-impl-review skill on the current working tree to validate your implementation against the project specification.

Frequently Asked Questions about ywc-impl-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for architecture, security, and QA before a PR?▼

Automated code review across architecture, security, and QA is performed by executing parallel multi-agent reviews on specific git ranges to validate structural integrity, contract adherence, and security compliance against project specifications.

What is multi-axis implementation conformance verification?▼

Multi-axis implementation conformance verification is a process that simultaneously evaluates Architecture, Design, Devex, Security, and QA domains using specialized subagents to ensure code aligns with specifications before human review.

How do I check code paths for OWASP security risks and structural boundary violations?▼

Checking specific code paths for OWASP security risks and structural boundary violations is done by targeting specific git ranges and running parallel multi-agent reviews that escalate ambiguous findings to a higher-tier advisor for prioritized remediation.

Does this implementation review tool require python3 and ripgrep?▼

Yes, this implementation review tool requires python3, ripgrep, uv, and gh installed in your environment to execute its two-phase mechanical analysis and advisor escalation pattern.

What's the best way to resolve ambiguous security findings during an automated code review?▼

Resolving ambiguous security findings during automated code review is handled by a two-phase advisor pattern that escalates only uncertain results from mechanical checks to an Opus-tier advisor to maximize frontier model efficiency and prioritize remediation.

When should I use a multi-agent code review instead of a standard linter?▼

Use a multi-agent code review instead of a standard linter when you need to validate complex backend API PRs for structural boundary violations, contract adherence, and missing test cases across five distinct quality dimensions before merging.