What problem does it solve? Sessions often end with unverified assumptions, silent risks, and missed blind spots that only surface later as bugs or rework. This Skill runs a deliberate end-of-session ritual that forces specific, evidence-based answers to two grounding questions instead of generic reassurances. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Confidence audit: Lists 4-8 concrete uncertainties tied to actual files, decisions, and assumptions from the session, each with what could go wrong. - Risk flagging and follow-through: Marks items as HIGH RISK when they involve silent wrong behavior, unverified architectural assumptions, security gaps, or irreversible actions, and offers to investigate them before closing. - Outside-view check: Applies Sam Altman's question through five lenses (framing, unstated assumptions, scope drift, simpler alternatives, unraised risks) to catch what neither party has said out loud. - Use Case: After a long refactoring session, trigger the wrap-up to discover that a renamed function was only grepped in one directory and that the session optimized the wrong part of a slow page. ## Quick Start Say "let's wrap up this session" to run the two-question end-of-session review before closing out your work.