What problem does it solve? Code tells you what it does but rarely why it exists. This Skill answers "why was this built this way" questions by fanning out parallel investigators across every available evidence source — git history, PRs, ADRs, issue trackers, docs, chat, observability, error tracking, and analytics — then synthesizing a confidence-calibrated, citation-backed answer instead of a confident guess. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Parallel evidence investigation: Spawns one investigator subagent per evidence category (source control, tickets, docs, chat, infra, errors, analytics, plus this repo's local ADRs and design notes), each with a source-specific playbook. - Confidence-tiered synthesis: A dedicated synthesizer classifies every claim as Direct, Supported, Inferred, Speculative, or Unknown, with mandatory citations and hedged language for inferences. - Honest gap reporting: Null results and unsearched sources are documented in a Sources Consulted coverage map rather than papered over. - Use Case: Ask "why is this retry limit set to 3?" and get back the PR discussion, linked ticket, and monitoring data that motivated it — or an explicit statement that no record exists. ## Quick Start Ask the agent "why was this code designed this way?" while pointing at a file, function, or constant in your repository.