What problem does it solve? Leaders often commit to consequential decisions on spend, hiring, positioning, or vendor choice without structured pushback, and a single AI response tends to agree with the asker. This Skill convenes a panel of opinionated expert personas that independently attack the decision's assumptions, then reconciles their disagreement into a verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Decision Framing: Restates the decision, constraints, stakes, and a "what must be true" conditions list so the panel tests named assumptions instead of inventing problems. - Roster Building: Combines standing archetypes (Finance Skeptic, Contrarian, Customer Advocate, Operator) with dynamically generated domain experts tailored to the specific decision. - Parallel Independent Critique: Runs all members concurrently so they never see each other's answers, spreading models where the runtime allows per-spawn model selection. - Structured Verdict: Synthesizes positions, condition checks, agreements, clashes, and a confidence-weighted recommendation in a fixed report format. - Use Case: Before signing a vendor contract, ask for a war council; the panel stress-tests the pricing assumptions, the Operator flags rollout capacity, and the verdict names the one fact that would settle the disagreement. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to convene a war council on a decision you are about to make, including your current thinking, constraints, and stakes.
