visa-redator

Convert conceptual domain models into canonical SDD artifacts for paridade-guard validation.

Updated May 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Adgmed2018/visa --skill visa-redator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: visa-redator
Source: https://github.com/Adgmed2018/visa/tree/main/agents/visa-redator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Adgmed2018/visa --skill visa-redator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Transforms the conceptual domain model from Modelador into executable, canonically structured SDD artifacts (e.g., BR-FUTURE and BR-DESCARTAR) that paridade-guard can validate and enforce.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generates _visa_sdd/business_model.md in canonical Reversa-compatible format with stable BR-FUTURE IDs and BR-DESCARTAR entries.
  • Produces _visa_sdd/discard_log.md and _visa_sdd/ambiguity_log.md to document decisions and uncertainties.
  • Outputs alignment artifacts that mirror the forward Writer/Curator roles in Reversa and map evidence to rules.

Quick Start

Feed the conceptual model outputs to the redactor and obtain canonical artifacts (business_model.md, discard_log.md, ambiguity_log.md) ready for paridade-guard validation.

Frequently Asked Questions about visa-redator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I convert a domain model into executable SDD specifications?▼

To convert a domain model into executable SDD specifications, you feed conceptual domain model outputs into a redactor to generate canonical business_model.md artifacts with stable BR-FUTURE IDs and BR-DESCARTAR entries for automated validation.

What is the best way to generate business rules from domain concepts for automated validation?▼

Generating business rules from domain concepts for automated validation involves transforming conceptual models into canonical SDD artifacts, producing BR-FUTURE and BR-DESCARTAR IDs that map evidence to rules for paridade-guard verification.

How do I document ambiguities and discarded decisions when creating executable specs?▼

To document ambiguities and discarded decisions when creating executable specs, you generate discard_log.md and ambiguity_log.md files alongside the business model to track uncertainties and document decision rationale.

Do I need a conceptual domain model before generating canonical SDD artifacts?▼

Yes, generating canonical SDD artifacts requires a conceptual domain model as input. The redactor processes these conceptual model outputs to produce Reversa-compatible business rules and alignment artifacts for paridade-guard enforcement.

Can I use these generated SDD artifacts for paridade-guard contract verification?▼

Yes, you can use the generated SDD artifacts for paridade-guard contract verification. The redactor outputs canonical _visa_sdd artifacts that enforce contracts and map evidence directly to business rules for validation.

What are the limitations of generating SDD artifacts from a domain model?▼

A limitation of generating SDD artifacts from a domain model is that the output depends entirely on the quality of the conceptual input. The redactor does not resolve domain uncertainties but logs them in ambiguity_log.md for review.