verification-before-completion

Verify completion claims by running proving commands and validating results.

Updated Jul 14, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/woodrowpearson/mids-hero-web --skill verification-before-completion-woodrowpearson
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/woodrowpearson/mids-hero-web/tree/main/.claude/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/woodrowpearson/mids-hero-web --skill verification-before-completion-woodrowpearson

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that any claim of completed work is supported by fresh verification evidence, preventing misleading statements and unnecessary rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-driven claims: Before declaring completion, collect and present fresh verification outputs (test results, lint outputs, or CI status).
  • Rule-based gatekeeping: Enforces a step-by-step workflow: identify proving command, run fully, read output, verify evidence, and only then declare success.
  • Use Case: Before merging a PR, run the verification sequence to confirm that tests pass and no critical issues remain.

Quick Start

Run the verification workflow by executing the steps: identify the command that proves completion, run it in full, review the results for exit codes and failures, confirm the evidence, and then safely declare completion with a summary of the verification outputs.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify task completion with evidence before merging a PR?▼

To verify completion before merging a PR, identify the proving command, execute it fully, and validate the test results or lint outputs before declaring success.

What is evidence-driven verification in software QA workflows?▼

Evidence-driven verification is a QA workflow that requires fresh verification outputs, such as test results or CI status, to back up any claims of completed work before success is declared.

How do I run a verification sequence to prevent misleading completion claims?▼

Run a verification sequence by identifying the command that proves completion, executing it fully, reviewing the exit codes and failures, and confirming the evidence before declaring success.

Can I use verification checks for quality assurance without external dependencies?▼

Yes, you can apply verification checks to QA workflows without external dependencies by running a rule-based gatekeeping process that validates fresh outputs directly.

What is the best way to enforce step-by-step verification before declaring success?▼

The best way to enforce verification is to apply a three-step approach: identify the proving command, execute it fully, and validate the results before declaring any task a success.

Why does declaring completion without fresh test results cause unnecessary rework?▼

Declaring completion without fresh test results causes rework because misleading statements are made when success claims are not backed by freshly validated verification evidence.