value-intellectual-property

Values early-stage patents, software rights, and know-how using cost, market, income, and rNPV approaches.

4|1|Updated Jul 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill value-intellectual-property-radarist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: value-intellectual-property
Source: https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills/tree/main/skills/value-intellectual-property
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill value-intellectual-property-radarist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Early-stage IP assets are routinely mispriced: teams equate sunk R&D spend with value, or present a fragile single-point DCF as a transaction price. This Skill applies WIPO's 2025 valuation guidance to produce a purpose-specific, evidence-backed value range with explicit assumptions and sensitivities instead of false precision. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-approach valuation: Selects among cost, market, income/DCF, risk-adjusted NPV, and real-options framing based on available evidence, then reconciles them without averaging away disagreement. - Deterministic arithmetic tool: The companion ipvalue.py script discounts cash flows, probability-adjusts staged cash flows, adjusts market comparables, and triangulates estimates with normalized weights. - Use Case: A university technology-transfer office needs a licensing range for a patent plus know-how bundle. The Skill fixes the valuation purpose and base date, builds an evidence ledger, computes low/base/high cases, and returns a defensible negotiation range with dominant sensitivities. ## Quick Start Use the value-intellectual-property skill to value this patent and know-how bundle for an exclusive licence negotiation, giving me a defensible range with sensitivities rather than a single price.

Frequently Asked Questions about value-intellectual-property

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I value a patent or IP asset for licensing?▼

Define the asset boundary, valuation purpose, base date, and premise first, then apply cost, market, and income approaches where evidence supports them. Reconcile the supported approaches into a range with low, base, and high cases plus dominant sensitivities rather than a single point price.

How to calculate rNPV for a biotech patent?▼

Weight each staged cash flow by its unconditional occurrence probability, then discount the adjusted flows at the chosen rate. The companion ipvalue.py script does this via the rnpv subcommand, taking comma-separated cash flows, probabilities, and a discount rate.

When should I use cost versus market versus income valuation approaches?▼

Use cost as a substitution ceiling and negotiation fact, market when genuinely comparable arm's-length transactions exist, and income/DCF when IP-attributable cash flows can be separated. Keep replacement cost outside the economic reconciliation unless the stated premise specifically values recreation.

Can this valuation be used for tax, damages, or financial reporting?▼

No. The output is an analytic estimate, not a valuation opinion, and must not be relied on as legal, tax, accounting, investment, or fairness advice. Tax, transfer-pricing, damages, litigation, and financial-reporting uses are routed to a qualified valuer.

What are the limitations of DCF for early-stage IP valuation?▼

A single-point DCF hides staged technical and regulatory uncertainty and creates false precision. For staged programs, probability-adjust cash flows (rNPV), report low/base/high scenarios, and expose the inputs that move value most, such as launch timing and success probability.