ux-review

Walk through the screen evaluating clarity, hierarchy, cognitive load, feedback, affordances, consistency, navigation, empty states, and error handling in order. For each violation, name the principle, show the exact element, and give a concrete correction.

Check six core principles: clarity, visual hierarchy, cognitive load, feedback within 100ms or progress indicators, affordances that match element function, and consistency of patterns. Also verify navigation, empty states, error messages, and loading indicators.

A UX review measures how well the interface reduces the distance between user intent and system effect, covering feedback, navigation, and error states. A visual quality review focuses on aesthetics like spacing, typography, and color rather than usability.

Reject findings that conflict with platform conventions like iOS HIG or Material Design, intentional high-density layouts for power users, deliberate empty states, non-visual feedback like haptics, and patterns defined by the project's design system.

Each finding names the violated principle, the exact element, a confidence level from CONFIRMED to SPECULATIVE, and a concrete correction. Flow-impacting issues like lost navigation come first, then clarity and hierarchy, then affordance and consistency.