ux-evaluator

UX review evaluates UI elements across three dimensions—Position, Visual Weight, and Spacing—against industry standards like Material Design and Nielsen heuristics. Provide a component description (e.g., button, navigation, form) and receive evidence-based recommendations with priority levels and rationale grounded in recognized design patterns.

Effective button design balances visual hierarchy, clickable area, and placement within the layout. This Skill benchmarks your button against Position, Visual Weight, and Spacing criteria, comparing it to guidelines from Balsamiq, Nielsen, and Material Design to surface specific improvements.

Structure feedback using a 3-dimension framework: evaluate Position (placement in context), Visual Weight (prominence relative to competing elements), and Spacing (breathing room and alignment). This converts vague critique into concrete, priority-ranked changes tied to industry heuristics.

Yes. The Skill analyzes any UI component's visual hierarchy and spacing against best practices. It applies the 3-dimension evaluation framework to layouts, forms, navigation, and other elements, delivering evidence-based verdicts aligned with Material Design and Nielsen principles.

The Skill grounds recommendations in recognized standards including Balsamiq wireframing principles, Nielsen's UX heuristics, and Material Design specifications. These references ensure verdicts reflect proven patterns rather than subjective opinion.

Request review when stakeholders debate design decisions, you need objective justification for changes, or you're unsure whether spacing, button placement, or visual weight align with best practices. The Skill converts uncertainty into structured, evidence-backed recommendations.