skills.rest
TeamSPWK
TeamSPWKOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

ux-audit

Run five parallel adversarial evaluators to identify UI/UX issues and update NOVA-STATE.md.

2|1|Updated Mar 26, 2026
Search Tags:#accessibility#reporting#design-review#ui-review#ux-audit#adversarial-analysis
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TeamSPWK/nova --skill ux-audit-teamspwk
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-audit
Source: https://github.com/TeamSPWK/nova/tree/main/.claude/skills/ux-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TeamSPWK/nova --skill ux-audit-teamspwk

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Detect UI/UX quality issues by mobilizing five independent adversarial evaluators who critique a product from multiple personas to surface actionable improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five parallel evaluators provide diverse perspectives on UI/UX quality.
  • Consolidated, prioritized improvement list with a single-source of truth.
  • NOVA-STATE.md is updated to reflect outcomes and decisions.

Quick Start

Run the ux-audit skill on your project to trigger a five-person adversarial UX evaluation and generate a short prioritized report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an adversarial UX audit to identify UI quality issues?▼

An adversarial UX audit identifies UI quality issues by mobilizing five independent evaluators to critique a product from multiple perspectives, aggregating results into a prioritized list of up to eight actionable improvements.

What is the best way to validate UI changes before a feature launch?▼

Validating UI changes before a feature launch is best achieved through multi-perspective adversarial reviews, which surface diverse usability issues and generate a consolidated, prioritized improvement list for the team.

When do I need a multi-perspective design review for frontend refactoring?▼

You need a multi-perspective design review for frontend refactoring when rigorous validation is required to ensure UI quality and accessibility standards are maintained during structural changes.

Can I use this approach for WCAG accessibility reporting?▼

Yes, this approach supports WCAG accessibility reporting by running five independent evaluators in parallel to rigorously validate UI compliance and aggregate identified accessibility issues into a single report.

How does an adversarial analysis prioritize UX issues?▼

Adversarial analysis prioritizes UX issues by running five parallel evaluators, aggregating their independent critiques, and consolidating the findings into a single-source-of-truth list of up to eight prioritized improvements.

Are there limitations to using five parallel evaluators for a UI review?▼

A limitation of using five parallel evaluators for a UI review is that the output is constrained to a maximum of eight prioritized issues, which may require further manual analysis if more defects exist.

Related Skills

Explore More Design & Creative Skills→
ketanswebsiteketanswebsite

ui-ux-design-advisor

Analyze project structure and design system to propose UI/UX design options.

Community
Advanced
daniel-dihardjadaniel-dihardja

shadcn

Manage shadcn/ui components and presets in Next.js and Vite projects.

Community
Advanced
luanrodriguesluanrodrigues
2

bee:dev-frontend-visual-vuejs

Generate and verify visual snapshots for Vue.js components across states and viewports.

Community
Advanced
shawn-sandyshawn-sandy

wcag-compliance-reviewer

Identify WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations in HTML/CSS and React/TypeScript code.

Community
Intermediate