ux-audit

Audit pages or components with six Krug-inspired usability checks.

42|9|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli --skill ux-audit-drvoss
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-audit
Source: https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/tree/main/skills/testing/ux-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli --skill ux-audit-drvoss

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

A fast, repeatable framework to diagnose why a page or component feels confusing, exposing structural issues in navigation, headings, calls-to-action, and copy so teams know what to fix first.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six Krug-inspired checks: Trunk Test, 3-Second Scan, Page Area, Happy Talk, Mindless Choice, and Goodwill Reservoir to surface both minor and structural issues.
  • Prioritized findings: Pass/Concern/Fail results per check, hard-fail signals, and a short prioritized list of fixes for engineering or design handoff.
  • Use Cases: Run during design reviews, post-release UX triage when users report confusion, or pre-handoff quality sweeps before frontend implementation.

Quick Start

Run a six-check UX audit of the target page or component and return a short human-readable report with pass/concern/fail outcomes and three prioritized fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a usability audit on a page to find what confuses users?▼

Run a usability audit using a six-check Krug-inspired workflow to evaluate navigation, headings, calls-to-action, and copy. It records pass, concern, or fail for each check and produces a human-readable report with prioritized fixes.

What is a heuristic evaluation for UX and when do I need it?▼

Heuristic evaluation for UX is a structured review to diagnose structural friction and confusion on a page or component. You need it during design handoffs, post-release user reports, or QA sweeps when navigation or copy feels ambiguous.

How do I prioritize UX fixes after identifying friction on a page?▼

Prioritize UX fixes by running a structured audit that highlights hard-fail signals across six checks. It generates a concise report with a short prioritized list of fixes for engineering or design handoff.

Can I use a UX audit during pre-handoff quality sweeps before frontend implementation?▼

Yes, you can use this UX audit during pre-handoff quality sweeps. It applies a six-check Trunk Test and 3-Second Scan workflow to surface minor and structural issues in page areas before frontend implementation.

What is the best way to review UI components for ambiguous calls to action?▼

The best way to review UI components for ambiguous calls to action is a structured component review applying Krug-inspired checks. It evaluates mindless choices and goodwill reservoirs, returning pass, concern, or fail outcomes per check.

Why does my page feel confusing to users after release?▼

Your page feels confusing due to structural issues in navigation, headings, calls-to-action, or copy. A six-check UX audit diagnoses this friction by recording pass, concern, or fail outcomes and highlighting hard-fail signals.