What problem does it solve? When multiple agents, PRs, or proposals offer competing implementation directions for TritonKit work, this Skill resolves the conflict into a single executable decision instead of a vague compromise. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Plan Normalization: Extracts goals, assumptions, touched files, validation gates, risks, and costs from each candidate plan before judging. - Structured Arbitration: Applies a fixed priority order (user requirements, product boundaries, real evidence, rollback safety, verification clarity, conflict surface, cost) to reach an Adopt, Hybrid, or Revise-first verdict. - Decision Memo Output: Produces a short memo covering the decision, rationale, execution steps, borrowed elements, rejected points, verification gates, and executor assignment. - Use Case: Two subagents propose different approaches for a TritonKit CLI feature; use this Skill to compare both against real repo files and schemas, then receive one clear execution plan with explicit verification steps. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to compare the attached Plan A and Plan B for the TritonKit issue and decide which one to execute.
