three-body-council

Facilitate multi-model AI deliberation and response evaluation through structured three-round debates.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw --skill three-body-council
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: three-body-council
Source: https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw/tree/main/agents/clawdia/skills/three-body-council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw --skill three-body-council

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of obtaining high-quality, well-reasoned answers and provides a robust method for evaluating AI-generated content by leveraging the collective intelligence of multiple advanced AI models.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Model Deliberation: Convenes three leading AI models (Claude Opus, GPT-5, Gemini Pro) for a structured three-round debate to synthesize a superior answer.
  • Automated Evaluation: Acts as an objective grading panel to assess AI responses against defined criteria, ensuring accuracy, completeness, and safety.
  • Use Case: Use deliberation mode to get the most comprehensive answer to a complex technical question. Use evaluation mode to automatically grade customer support bot responses for factual accuracy and helpfulness.

Quick Start

Use the three-body-council skill to convene the council and ask "What is the best approach to implementing a PID controller?".

Frequently Asked Questions about three-body-council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multiple AI models to evaluate and grade LLM responses?▼

Multi-model evaluation grades LLM responses by convening models like Claude Opus, GPT-5, and Gemini Pro as an objective panel. This automated grading assesses AI outputs against defined assertions and rubrics to ensure factual accuracy, completeness, and safety.

What is multi-model AI deliberation for synthesizing answers?▼

Multi-model AI deliberation is a structured three-round debate process where leading models argue and refine their positions. This approach leverages collective intelligence to synthesize a superior, well-reasoned answer for complex technical questions.

Can I use multi-model deliberation with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google AI APIs?▼

Yes, multi-model deliberation integrates directly with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google AI APIs for model access. You can convene models like Claude Opus, GPT-5, and Gemini Pro simultaneously to generate synthesized answers or grade outputs.

What is the best way to evaluate customer support bot responses for factual accuracy?▼

The best way to evaluate customer support bot responses is using an automated grading panel that checks outputs against specific assertions and rubrics. This multi-model evaluation ensures the responses meet factual accuracy and helpfulness criteria.

Do I need the requests library to run multi-model AI evaluation scripts?▼

Yes, you need the requests library installed as a dependency to run the multi-model AI evaluation scripts. These scripts facilitate the API integrations and structured debate processes required for both deliberation and grading.

How does multi-model AI deliberation compare to using a single LLM for complex questions?▼

Multi-model deliberation convenes multiple leading models for a structured three-round debate, whereas a single LLM relies on one perspective. This collective intelligence approach synthesizes a more comprehensive and well-reasoned answer than single-model generation.