threat-modeling-agentic-systems

Map MAESTRO, MITRE ATLAS, or OWASP catalog items to agentic trust boundaries.

2|Updated May 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs --skill threat-modeling-agentic-systems
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: threat-modeling-agentic-systems
Source: https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs/tree/main/skills/security/threat-modeling-agentic-systems
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs --skill threat-modeling-agentic-systems

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you systematically threat-model autonomous and multi-agent AI systems before deployment so you can catch agent-specific risks early instead of after incidents.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Catalog-based analysis: Works against a user-supplied framework such as MAESTRO, MITRE ATLAS, or OWASP Agentic Security Initiative.
  • Agent boundary mapping: Evaluates planner-to-executor flows, tool-result feedback loops, memory persistence, loop control, identity scope, and agent-to-agent communication.
  • Practical security review: Useful for code-review agents, research agents, workflow orchestrators, and any tool-using system with iterations, scratchpad memory, or multi-agent collaboration.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to threat-model your agentic system using a specific catalog and include the agent’s tools, memory model, loop limit, and identity scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about threat-modeling-agentic-systems

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I threat model an agentic AI system before deployment?▼

Threat model agentic AI systems by mapping catalog items from frameworks like MAESTRO or MITRE ATLAS to agentic trust boundaries, rating likelihood and impact, and producing a threat register with mitigations and coverage gaps.

What security risks do multi-agent workflows and tool-using assistants face?▼

Multi-agent workflows face risks like memory poisoning, runaway loops, and agent-to-agent communication exploits across planner-executor flows, tool-result feedback loops, and identity scope boundaries.

Can I use OWASP Agentic Security Initiative to review planner-executor agents?▼

Yes, you can apply the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative to review planner-executor agents by supplying the catalog to evaluate agent boundaries, loop control, memory persistence, and identity scope.

How do I analyze the blast radius of a runaway loop in autonomous agents?▼

Analyze runaway-loop blast radius by evaluating the agent's loop limits, tool-result feedback loops, and scratchpad memory within the threat modeling process to contain potential autonomous execution failures.

What do I need to provide to start threat modeling an autonomous AI system?▼

Provide a specific threat catalog like MITRE ATLAS, MAESTRO, or OWASP ASI, along with details about the agent's tools, memory model, loop limits, and identity scope to map agentic trust boundaries.