technical-writing

Write and review technical documentation using Diátaxis structure and clarity rules.

2|Updated Sep 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kwanpham2195/agent-stuff --skill technical-writing-kwanpham2195
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: technical-writing
Source: https://github.com/kwanpham2195/agent-stuff/tree/main/skills/technical-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kwanpham2195/agent-stuff --skill technical-writing-kwanpham2195

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Technical documents often confuse readers with ambiguous wording, bloated sentences, and unclear structure. This Skill applies a consistent editorial standard so READMEs, RFCs, tutorials, and reference docs are understandable on the first read while preserving technical accuracy. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Purpose-driven structure: Classifies documents using the Diátaxis model (tutorial, how-to, reference, explanation) and applies the right conventions for each. - Sentence-level editing: Enforces one instruction per sentence, direct reader address, unambiguous modifiers and pronouns, and removal of filler wording. - Review or rewrite modes: Returns findings for read-only reviews or revised artifacts when edits are authorized, with verification of technical claims against source evidence. - Use Case: You draft a README for a new CLI tool. The Skill restructures it as a how-to, rewrites vague steps into testable commands, fixes ambiguous phrasing, and flags any claims it cannot verify from the code. ## Quick Start Review the README in this repository for clarity and structure, and report actionable findings without editing the file.

Frequently Asked Questions about technical-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure technical documentation for developers?▼

Use the Diátaxis model to pick one primary purpose: tutorial for learners, how-to for task completion, reference for lookup, or explanation for reasoning. Structure the document around that purpose and link to material serving other purposes rather than mixing them.

How to review a README for clarity and accuracy?▼

Check that the structure serves the reader's task, each instruction includes prerequisites and expected results, and all commands and claims match the actual code. Flag ambiguous modifiers, unclear pronoun referents, and unverifiable statements instead of inventing facts.

What is the Diátaxis framework for documentation?▼

Diátaxis divides documentation into four types: tutorials, how-to guides, reference, and explanation. Each serves a distinct reader need, and mixing them in one document reduces clarity, so substantial material of a different type should be split and linked.

Can this skill edit files or only review them?▼

It does both depending on authorization. Review requests return findings without edits; when edits are authorized it returns the revised artifact. It never commits, publishes, or changes code as part of a writing task.

When should I not force a document into a Diátaxis category?▼

Plans, RFCs, PR descriptions, commits, and release notes have their own required formats. Preserve those formats and apply only the sentence-level clarity and accuracy checks to their prose.