tech-divergence

Score technical implementation options across 8 dimensions to trigger Gate 4 review.

341|48|Updated Apr 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well --skill tech-divergence
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tech-divergence
Source: https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well/tree/main/cursor-rules/skills/tech-divergence
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well --skill tech-divergence

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a disciplined framework to evaluate multiple technical options for a given problem by applying an 8-dimension scoring matrix and signaling when Gate 4 should involve human decision-makers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 8-Dimension Scoring Matrix: scores patterns, scope, data models, dependencies, API surface, reversibility, security, and performance to guide decision-making.
  • Gate 4 Trigger: automatically identifies when human input is required for high-stakes architectural decisions.
  • Plan Mode Integration: designed for Plan Mode Phase 2 (Technical Diverge) to compare alternative architectures and patterns.

Quick Start

Apply tech-divergence during Plan Mode Phase 2 to score options A, B, and C and determine whether to auto-proceed or escalate to Gate 4 for review.

Frequently Asked Questions about tech-divergence

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate and compare different technical architecture options for a project?▼

To evaluate technical architectures, apply an 8-dimension scoring matrix that scores patterns, scope, data models, dependencies, API surface, reversibility, security, and performance to output a recommended approach or flag for human review.

When do I need human review for architectural decision-making?▼

Human review for architectural decision-making is triggered at Gate 4 when high-stakes technical divergence is detected, whereas low-risk scores auto-proceed without escalation to human decision-makers.

How do I score data models and dependencies during technical divergence?▼

Scoring data models and dependencies during technical divergence involves applying a structured scoring matrix across 8 dimensions to compare alternative architectures and determine whether to auto-proceed or escalate to Gate 4.

What is the best way to compare performance implications across multiple valid technical approaches?▼

The best way to compare performance implications across valid technical approaches is using a structured scoring matrix during Plan Mode Phase 2 to quantify options and output a recommended approach or flag for Gate 4 human review.

Does this architecture evaluation process auto-proceed for low-risk technical decisions?▼

Yes, the architecture evaluation process features auto-proceed behavior for low-risk scores, automatically continuing without human input and only triggering Gate 4 for high-stakes architectural decisions that require manual review.

Can I use this scoring matrix outside of Plan Mode Phase 2?▼

The scoring matrix is specifically designed for Plan Mode Phase 2 (Technical Diverge) to compare architectures, data models, dependencies, and performance implications across multiple valid approaches to determine Gate 4 triggers.