What problem does it solve? Political and media claims about Taiwan government budget cuts are often misleading, mixing proposals with final results, conflating deletions with freezes, or using unclear baselines. This Skill restores such claims to traceable amounts, procedures, account items, and verifiable business impacts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Four-Baseline Comparison: Compares prior-year statutory budget, prior-year final accounts, current-year proposed budget, and current-year post-third-reading statutory budget so every percentage has a clear denominator. - Deletion vs. Freeze Separation: Calculates deletion rates and freeze rates separately, tracks unfreezing conditions, and never combines them into a misleading "total cut" figure. - Impact Evidence Grading: Classifies claimed impacts (service suspensions, reduced quotas) as proven, calculable estimates, agency claims, third-party claims, or unproven, using a reproducible evidence chain. - Use Case: A user pastes a news article claiming a ministry's budget was "cut 20% and services will halt." The Skill retrieves official budget books and legislative records, verifies the actual deletion and freeze amounts, checks the procedural status, and outputs a structured fact-check report with a verdict of established, partially established, misleading, false, or insufficient evidence. ## Quick Start Use the taiwan-government-budget-auditor skill to fact-check this budget claim, separating the comparison baseline, deletions, freezes, procedural status, and verifiable impacts.
