What problem does it solve? Planning and reporting a rigorous literature review in AEC research is error-prone: reviewers demand PRISMA-grade transparency, reproducible search strings, counted exclusion reasons, and honest quality appraisal, and missing any of these gets papers desk-rejected. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Review Type Selection: Distinguishes systematic, scoping, rapid, umbrella, bibliometric, and narrative reviews with the correct reporting standard for each (PRISMA 2020, PRISMA-ScR, AMSTAR-2). - Protocol & Search Design: Templates for eligibility criteria, Boolean search strings with AEC-specific synonym blocks, per-database hit counts, and screening workflows with double-screening and Cohen's kappa. - PRISMA Flow & Appraisal: Full PRISMA 2020 flow-diagram count template, 27-item checklist, risk-of-bias instruments (MMAT, AXIS, CASP, AMSTAR-2), data extraction schema, and synthesis guidance. - Use Case: You are writing a systematic review on digital twins for construction safety monitoring. Use this Skill to build the search string, track screening counts, appraise modeling-study rigor, and produce a PRISMA-compliant flow diagram. ## Quick Start Help me design a PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review protocol on digital twins for construction safety monitoring, including the search string and screening plan.
