systematic-debugging

Diagnose bugs through a four-phase root cause investigation process before proposing fixes.

Updated Dec 19, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DNepovim/yadm --skill systematic-debugging-dnepovim
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: systematic-debugging
Source: https://github.com/DNepovim/yadm/tree/main/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-plugins-official/superpowers/5.0.6/skills/systematic-debugging
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DNepovim/yadm --skill systematic-debugging-dnepovim

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Random fixes and quick patches waste time, mask underlying issues, and introduce new bugs. This Skill enforces a disciplined debugging methodology that finds root causes before any fix is attempted, even under time pressure or social pressure to take shortcuts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Four-Phase Process: Root cause investigation, pattern analysis, hypothesis testing, and implementation, with mandatory completion of each phase before proceeding. - Supporting Techniques: Includes root-cause-tracing for backward call-stack analysis, defense-in-depth validation at multiple layers, and condition-based waiting to replace flaky arbitrary timeouts in tests. - Pressure Resistance: Explicit anti-patterns, red flags, and rationalization tables that stop shortcut behavior during emergencies, plus a rule to question the architecture after 3+ failed fixes. - Use Case: A test fails intermittently in CI. Instead of adding sleep delays, follow Phase 1 to reproduce and gather evidence, trace the bad value to its source, then fix at the origin with a failing test proving the resolution. ## Quick Start Use the systematic-debugging skill to investigate this failing test and find its root cause before suggesting any fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about systematic-debugging

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I debug a test failure systematically instead of guessing?▼

Follow the four phases: investigate the root cause by reading errors and reproducing consistently, analyze patterns against working examples, form and test a single hypothesis, then implement one fix with a failing test case. Never propose fixes before completing Phase 1.

How to find the root cause of a bug deep in the call stack?▼

Trace backward through the call chain from the immediate cause to the original trigger, asking what called each level and what value was passed. Add stack trace instrumentation with console.error before the failing operation if manual tracing is not possible.

Should I apply a quick fix during a production emergency?▼

No. The skill mandates root cause investigation even under time pressure, because systematic debugging is faster than guess-and-check thrashing. Quick symptom fixes mask the real issue and typically create new bugs.

How do I fix flaky tests caused by timing issues?▼

Replace arbitrary setTimeout or sleep delays with condition-based waiting that polls for the actual condition you care about, such as an event appearing or state changing. Poll every 10ms with a timeout and clear error message.

What should I do when multiple fix attempts keep failing?▼

Stop after three failed fixes and question the architecture rather than attempting a fourth. Repeated failures where each fix reveals new problems elsewhere indicate a fundamentally wrong pattern, which should be discussed before continuing.

When is a single validation check not enough after fixing a bug?▼

Single-point validation can be bypassed by other code paths, refactoring, or mocks. Apply defense-in-depth by validating at every layer data passes through: entry points, business logic, environment guards, and debug instrumentation.