stellar-competitive-landscape

Describe your idea in one sentence and optionally a category like Financial Protocols or Payments. The Skill searches the LumenLoop ecosystem database by category and keyword overlap, then ranks the top 10-15 matches by relevance, SCF funding, and GitHub activity.

It uses two sources: the LumenLoop ecosystem database with 728 curated Stellar projects including SCF funding history, and Electric Capital's dataset of roughly 9000 Stellar-tagged GitHub repos for developer activity signals like commit recency and contributor counts.

Saturation is judged only by SCF-funded project count, not community-listed entries, since unfunded listings are weaker competitive signals. A category with one or two funded players is treated as saturated, while many small players suggests a fragmented, possibly open space.

If the database returns zero matches for your category, the Skill reports that as a finding that the space may be genuinely open rather than an error. It does not invent project names and states honestly when data is missing.

Yes. It mines Electric Capital repo data to surface GitHub orgs with multiple Stellar repos that are not yet in LumenLoop, flagging emerging players, dormant attempts, and keyword clusters. Noise like tutorial repos, training-program repos, and official forks is filtered out.