steep-pestle-analysis

Sweeps macro-environment factors into a rated driver inventory using the STEEP/PESTLE checklist.

4|1|Updated Jul 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill steep-pestle-analysis-radarist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: steep-pestle-analysis
Source: https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills/tree/main/skills/steep-pestle-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill steep-pestle-analysis-radarist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Analysts routinely over-scan the categories they understand, usually market and technology, and skip the rest, leaving whole classes of external risk invisible until they fork the plan. This Skill forces full coverage of the STEEP/PESTLE categories and turns a raw factor list into a rated, clustered driver inventory that strategy and scenario work can actually consume. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Forced category coverage: Sweeps Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, plus Legal and Ethical categories, requiring 4-10 evidenced, dated, directional factors per letter and declaring thin categories as findings. - Rated driver inventory: Scores every factor 1-5 for impact and uncertainty with a rationale, deduplicates and clusters factors into 8-15 named driving forces, and sorts them on an impact x uncertainty map into predetermined elements versus critical uncertainties. - Scenario handoff: Packages critical uncertainties as scenario-axis candidates for scenario-planning and predetermined elements as planning assumptions, with a coverage audit. - Use Case: A retailer deciding whether to commit capital to automated micro-fulfilment centres by 2029 gets a driver inventory showing online-grocery demand and courier-labour regulation as the critical uncertainties, while falling automation costs enter every plan as a constant. ## Quick Start Use the steep-pestle-analysis skill to run a PESTLE analysis of the macro-environment for our decision to enter the German market by 2028, rating each factor for impact and uncertainty.

Frequently Asked Questions about steep-pestle-analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a PESTLE analysis for a business decision?▼

Frame the focal question with the decision, geography, and horizon, then sweep each PESTLE category for 4-10 dated, evidence-backed factors. Rate each factor 1-5 for impact and uncertainty, cluster them into named driving forces, and sort the drivers into predetermined elements versus critical uncertainties.

What is the difference between STEEP, PESTLE, and PEST analysis?▼

All descend from Aguilar's 1967 ETPS categories. PEST covers Political, Economic, Social, and Technological forces; STEEP adds Environmental; PESTLE adds Legal; and STEEPLE adds Ethical. This Skill sweeps the full set, including Legal and Ethical where regulation or norms are live.

When should I use PESTLE analysis instead of Porter's five forces?▼

Use PESTLE for the macro-environment above the industry: broad social, technological, economic, environmental, and political forces affecting a decision. Use five-forces-analysis for industry structure questions about suppliers, buyers, rivals, substitutes, and entry barriers.

How are predetermined elements different from critical uncertainties?▼

Predetermined elements are high-impact, low-uncertainty drivers you can treat as planning constants in every scenario. Critical uncertainties are high-impact, high-uncertainty drivers that become scenario-axis candidates or research items handed off to scenario planning.

What are the limitations of a PESTLE factor list?▼

An unrated list of factors prioritizes nothing, so this method requires impact and uncertainty scores with rationales for every driver. It also excludes internal capabilities, which belong in a SWOT, and does not build the scenarios themselves.