staff-session

Coordinate multi-person architectural planning and review with PM-gated synthesized outputs.

5|2|Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude --skill staff-session
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: staff-session
Source: https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/tree/main/plugins/coordinator/skills/staff-session
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude --skill staff-session

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Staff-session coordinates multi-person architectural planning and review so PMs can delegate implementation details while ensuring the final plan or findings are rigorously challenged and synthesized.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • PM-Gated team planning & review: runs in plan mode to craft new architectural plans, or review mode to critique an existing artifact with structured findings.
  • Tiered dispatch: supports lightweight single-reviewer routing as well as standard/full multi-debater staff sessions.
  • Role-bounded decision making: debaters produce competing positions; a dedicated synthesizer resolves conflicts into a final output without turning into full implementation ownership.

Quick Start

Use staff-session in plan mode to generate a new architecture plan by running: /staff-session --mode plan --tier standard <objectives-or-doc-path>.

Frequently Asked Questions about staff-session

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run multi-agent architectural planning with a synthesizer?▼

Multi-agent architectural planning uses tiered debaters to produce competing positions, which a dedicated synthesizer resolves into a final PM-gated output. You initiate this by running a plan mode command with your objectives and a specified execution tier.

What is the best way to critique an existing architecture artifact with structured findings?▼

Critiquing an existing artifact uses review mode to generate structured findings through configured debater tiers. A dedicated synthesizer resolves conflicts and produces a final PM-gated critique without taking on full implementation ownership.

How does role separation work in a staff session for architectural decisions?▼

Role separation in a staff session assigns competing positions to debaters while a dedicated synthesizer resolves conflicts into the final output. This ensures rigorous challenge and synthesis without the synthesizer assuming full implementation ownership.

Can I use lightweight routing for single-reviewer architectural plan generation?▼

Yes, lightweight routing supports single-reviewer dispatch for architectural plan generation. You can configure tiered dispatch to route between lightweight single-reviewer execution and standard or full multi-debater staff sessions.

When do I need PM-gated decisions for team orchestration?▼

PM-gated decisions are needed when coordinating multi-person architectural planning and review so PMs can delegate implementation details. This ensures final plans or findings are rigorously challenged by debaters and synthesized before approval.

Does staff-session support deterministic team orchestration and routing rules?▼

Yes, staff-session satisfies deterministic team orchestration by applying strict routing rules for lightweight versus standard or full execution. It separates roles between debaters and a synthesizer to produce PM-gated synthesized outputs.