src-hunter

Guides authorized bug bounty hunting through a five-phase recon-to-report workflow.

21|8|Updated Aug 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/chengzongcai/reverse-skill-backup --skill src-hunter-chengzongcai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: src-hunter
Source: https://github.com/chengzongcai/reverse-skill-backup/tree/main/skills/pentest-tools/src-hunter
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/chengzongcai/reverse-skill-backup --skill src-hunter-chengzongcai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Security researchers on SRC, crowdsourced testing, and bug bounty programs often guess commands and miss high-value vulnerability classes; this Skill replaces ad-hoc testing with a repeatable five-phase workflow (intake, recon, enum, hunt, report) backed by real disclosed-case statistics and structured payloads. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-phase methodology: Intake scope parsing, passive recon, active enumeration, vulnerability hunting, and CVSS 4.0 report generation with evidence discipline rules. - 19 attack-class playbooks: SQLi, XSS, RCE, SSRF, IDOR, OAuth/JWT/SAML, file upload, path traversal, race conditions, GraphQL, mobile, LLM prompt injection, and more, each embedding real HackerOne High/Critical cases and WAF/EDR bypass variants. - Knowledge base: 305 structured payloads, 263 WAF/EDR bypass steps, 2887 disclosed HackerOne reports, WooYun statistical residue, Chinese-component fingerprint and default-credential dictionaries, plus banking and telecom vertical playbooks. - Use Case: Given a bug bounty program URL, the Skill scopes the engagement, enumerates subdomains and endpoints, prioritizes high-hit-rate classes like password reset (88% high-severity rate) and arbitrary account takeover, then produces a submission-ready report. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to run the src-hunter workflow against your authorized bug bounty target, for example by saying "use src-hunter to test https://target.example.com within its program scope".

Frequently Asked Questions about src-hunter

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I start a bug bounty hunt against a new target?▼

Begin with the intake phase: extract the program scope, out-of-scope assets, payout rules, and test accounts. Then run passive recon (CT logs, Wayback, GitHub dorks) before active enumeration with tools like subfinder, httpx, and ffuf, and only then enter the hunt phase.

What vulnerability classes should I test first in a bug bounty program?▼

Prioritize by high-severity hit rate: password reset flaws (88% high-severity), arbitrary account takeover (86.4%), payment and amount tampering (74-83%), then unauthorized access, default credentials, and IDOR. The Skill's timebox templates map these to 6-hour, single-day, and month-long engagements.

Does this Skill work for WAF bypass testing?▼

Yes, it includes a bypass toolkit covering SQLi, XSS, command injection, path traversal, and SSRF filter evasion, plus 263 WAF/EDR bypass steps across 23 web attack classes. It covers protocol-layer tricks like HPP, chunked encoding, and content-type confusion.

Can I use these payloads on any website I find?▼

No. The Skill enforces strict rules of engagement: only test assets within an authorized program scope, use self-registered accounts for authorization testing, take minimal data samples, and never exfiltrate real user PII or leave webshells. Unauthorized testing is illegal.

What evidence is required for a valid bug bounty report?▼

Every claim needs reproducible HTTP captures, differential proof (true vs false condition requests), and observable side effects such as OOB callbacks. The Skill provides a CVSS 4.0 report template and a pre-submission checklist covering reproduction rate, screenshots, and PII redaction.

When should I not use this bug bounty workflow?▼

Avoid it for pure white-box source code audits, defensive remediation questions, or standalone CTF challenges, since the workflow assumes black-box authorized testing of real targets. It is also unsuitable for any target outside a defined program scope.