spectra-discuss

Guide one-question-at-a-time discussions to reach documented conclusions.

45|3|Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter --skill spectra-discuss-yudefine
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: spectra-discuss
Source: https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/tree/main/.claude/skills/spectra-discuss
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter --skill spectra-discuss-yudefine

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables focused, convergent discussions to reach clear conclusions, reducing ambiguity and guiding teams toward actionable outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided discussion mode that enforces one-question-at-a-time exploration and structured decision-making.
  • Supports capture and tagging of decisions and artifacts (like design notes and proposals) to feed OpenSpec-style workflows.
  • Use Case: When evaluating architecture choices or process changes, teams can converge on a recommended path with documented reasoning.

Quick Start

Begin a discuss session by issuing /spectra:discuss <topic> to start a focused, goal-oriented conversation.

Frequently Asked Questions about spectra-discuss

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I facilitate structured decision-making for architecture choices?▼

Facilitate structured decision-making by guiding teams through one-question-at-a-time exploration, option comparison, and concrete outcomes to reach a clear conclusion. This enforces discussion guardrails and prevents implementation actions while promoting documentation.

What is the best way to run convergent discussions on design questions?▼

Run convergent discussions on design questions by enforcing one-question-at-a-time exploration and structured decision-making. This approach reduces ambiguity and guides teams toward actionable, documented outcomes with clear reasoning.

Can I capture and tag architecture decisions to feed OpenSpec workflows?▼

Yes, you can capture and tag decisions and artifacts like design notes and proposals during discussions to feed OpenSpec-style workflows. This supports discovery of OpenSpec artifacts and promotes documentation of the recommended path.

How do I start a focused discussion session to reach a conclusion?▼

Start a focused discussion session by issuing a command with your topic to begin a goal-oriented conversation. The session guides users through structured exploration, option comparison, and concrete outcomes to reach a clear conclusion.

Does this discussion facilitation approach enforce guardrails against implementation actions?▼

Yes, this discussion facilitation approach enforces discussion guardrails and explicitly prevents implementation actions. It focuses solely on convergent discussions, option comparison, and promoting documentation rather than executing changes.

When do I need structured facilitation for convergent discussions?▼

You need structured facilitation for convergent discussions when evaluating architecture choices or process changes and teams must converge on a recommended path with documented reasoning. It reduces ambiguity and guides teams toward actionable outcomes.