sp-adjust

Updates strategy, OKRs, and BSC targets based on cycle monitoring results and documented learnings.

1|Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NestorMonroy/thyrox --skill sp-adjust-nestormonroy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sp-adjust
Source: https://github.com/NestorMonroy/thyrox/tree/main/.claude/skills/sp-adjust
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NestorMonroy/thyrox --skill sp-adjust-nestormonroy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Closing a strategic planning cycle requires honest evaluation of what worked, but teams often skip documenting learnings or confuse execution failures with wrong assumptions, causing the same strategic errors to repeat in the next cycle. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Assumption Evaluation: Classifies each Strategy Map assumption as confirmed, partially confirmed, or incorrect, distinguishing execution failures from invalid hypotheses. - Cycle Decision Framework: Guides an explicit leadership decision among three options — continue and refine, partial pivot, or full strategic redesign — based on the percentage of confirmed assumptions. - OKR and BSC Refresh: Updates KPI baselines and targets for the next cycle using actual results, and documents strategic learnings in a structured strategy-refresh template. - Use Case: At the end of an annual strategy cycle, a leadership team reviews KPI outcomes, discovers that 55% of Strategy Map assumptions held, chooses a partial pivot, and produces a strategy-adjustment document with refreshed OKRs and three documented learnings. ## Quick Start Use the sp-adjust skill to evaluate this year's strategic cycle results and produce the strategy-adjustment document with updated OKRs and BSC targets.

Frequently Asked Questions about sp-adjust

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a strategic planning cycle review?▼

Evaluate each Strategy Map assumption against actual results, classify outcomes as confirmed, partial, or incorrect, then decide explicitly whether to continue, partially pivot, or redesign. Document learnings and refresh OKRs and BSC targets from the new baseline.

How to tell execution failure from a wrong strategic assumption?▼

Check whether planned activities were actually carried out. If they were executed but did not produce the expected result, the underlying assumption is likely wrong; if activities were skipped or done poorly, it is an execution problem requiring process improvement.

When should a company pivot its strategy mid-cycle?▼

A mid-cycle adjustment is justified by events like a disruptive competitor gaining over 10% market share, regulatory changes invalidating the business model, or financial KPIs in red for three consecutive quarters. A single bad quarter is not sufficient evidence.

What percentage of confirmed assumptions triggers a strategy redesign?▼

If fewer than 40% of Strategy Map assumptions are confirmed, or the environment changed materially, a full strategic redesign is recommended. Between 40-70% suggests a partial pivot, and above 70% supports continuing with refinement.

What are the limitations of annual strategy adjustment?▼

Distinguishing execution failure from wrong assumptions requires honesty and data that is sometimes hard to obtain. Frequent OKR refreshes cause organizational fatigue, and pivot decisions are politically complex, often requiring board-level support.