skill-pressure-test

Interrogates plans and designs one question at a time to expose flaws before commitment.

Updated Aug 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GongYuanCaiJi/dsh-claude-octopus --skill skill-pressure-test-gongyuancaiji
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-pressure-test
Source: https://github.com/GongYuanCaiJi/dsh-claude-octopus/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-pressure-test
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GongYuanCaiJi/dsh-claude-octopus --skill skill-pressure-test-gongyuancaiji

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Plans, specs, and designs often contain hidden contradictions, tangled dependencies, and unspoken assumptions that only surface after costly implementation. This Skill stress-tests a position through disciplined one-at-a-time questioning before you commit to it. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Sequential Interrogation: Asks one question at a time, each carrying a recommended answer the user can confirm or precisely dispute. - Fact vs. Decision Separation: Looks up verifiable facts in the repository, git history, and configs itself, while reserving genuine decisions for the user. - Dependency-Driven Flow: Follows the decision tree as answers unfold, dropping moot questions and naming contradictions explicitly. - Use Case: Before a hard-to-reverse database migration, have the plan interrogated so scope ambiguities, rollback assumptions, and conflicting decisions are settled in writing first. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to pressure-test your current plan or design by interviewing you one question at a time until it holds.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-pressure-test

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a plan or design before committing to it?▼

Have the plan interrogated one question at a time, with each question carrying a recommended answer you can confirm or dispute. The process follows decision dependencies, surfaces contradictions, and ends with a verdict of sound, sound-with-changes, or unsound.

What is the difference between pressure-testing and brainstorming a plan?▼

Brainstorming opens a space up and generates options, while pressure-testing closes one down and looks for what is wrong with an existing position. Use pressure-testing only when a plan already exists and the risk is an unspoken flaw.

When should I not use a plan interrogation workflow?▼

Skip it when you need options generated, when no position exists yet, or when the answer is discoverable by reading the codebase. It also stops early if the plan proves sound or if an answer invalidates the entire premise.

Why ask one question at a time instead of a full questionnaire?▼

Batched questions get shallow, questionnaire-style answers shaped by whichever item the reader cares about. A single answered question changes what the next question should be, producing deeper and more accurate resolution.

What output does a plan pressure test produce?▼

It produces a verdict on where the plan stands, the decisions settled in order, changes the answers caused, questions still open with what they block, and facts found with their sources cited.