What problem does it solve? When a Leader in an expert group delegates a specialized subtask, the Member needs a consistent way to research, evaluate, and report back without fabricating information or overstepping scope. This Skill provides a structured analysis workflow that produces conclusions with evidence, stated uncertainty, and actionable next steps. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Input Verification: Confirms the target question, known facts, constraints, deliverables, and acceptance criteria before starting, and declares reasonable assumptions when minor information is missing. - Structured Analysis Rules: Separates facts, inferences, and recommendations; attaches sources or verifiable reasoning chains to key conclusions; and always considers at least one alternative explanation. - Risk and Scope Discipline: Explicitly lists risks, applicability conditions, and unverified items, and never expands the team goal or issues final answers on behalf of the Leader. - Use Case: A Leader assigns a Member the subtask of evaluating two candidate architectures. The Member analyzes trade-offs, reports a conclusion with confidence level, presents the alternative option, flags unverified assumptions, and recommends the next investigation step. ## Quick Start Analyze the assigned subtask on the given topic and return a conclusion with confidence level, supporting evidence, an alternative explanation, risks, and recommended next steps to the Leader.
