skill-code-review

Synthesize multi-LLM code review findings into inline PR comments.

1|Updated Jun 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mhdxbilal/Ai --skill skill-code-review-mhdxbilal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-code-review
Source: https://github.com/mhdxbilal/Ai/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mhdxbilal/Ai --skill skill-code-review-mhdxbilal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinating high-velocity, multi-provider code reviews is complex and time-consuming; this skill orchestrates multiple AI reviewers to produce a unified, actionable assessment with inline PR feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrated Multi-LLM Review: coordinates several AI reviewers to surface diverse perspectives on code quality, security, and architecture.
  • Inline PR Comments & Synthesis: generates concrete inline comments and a consolidated synthesis suitable for PR discussions.
  • Compliance Gates & Risk Signals: enforces defined validation gates, highlights critical risks, and suggests remediation steps.
  • Use Case: when reviewing a pull request with security and quality implications, run the skill to obtain a comprehensive, multi-model analysis.

Quick Start

Provide a pull request or code diff to start the full multi-LLM code-review pipeline and receive a structured synthesis.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-LLM code reviews on a pull request?▼

To automate multi-LLM code reviews, provide a pull request or code diff to orchestrate several AI reviewers, synthesizing their findings into inline PR comments and a consolidated risk assessment.

Can I use multiple AI models to find security and quality issues in a code diff?▼

Yes, coordinating multiple AI models on a code diff surfaces diverse perspectives on security and quality issues, synthesizing the findings into a unified assessment with actionable inline PR feedback.

What is the best way to synthesize AI code review feedback from different providers?▼

The best way to synthesize AI code review feedback is using a structured pipeline that aggregates findings from multiple providers, enforcing compliance gates to produce verifiable, consolidated outputs.

How do I enforce validation gates and compliance checks during automated code review?▼

Automated code review enforces validation gates and compliance checks by applying structured review phases to pull requests, highlighting critical risks and suggesting remediation steps before outputs are synthesized.

Does multi-LLM code review work on local code directories or only pull request diffs?▼

Multi-LLM code review works on both local code directories and pull request diffs, analyzing the provided source to surface security, quality, and architectural issues across the codebase.

When should I avoid using a multi-provider pipeline for code review?▼

Avoid using a multi-provider pipeline for code review when you lack explicit gating mechanisms to ensure verifiable outputs, as synthesizing raw findings without structured phases may produce unactionable feedback.