simplify

Review code changes for reuse opportunities and architecture boundary violations.

17|Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills --skill simplify-alexiolan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: simplify
Source: https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills/tree/main/skills/simplify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills --skill simplify-alexiolan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviewing code changes is error-prone and time-consuming; it often misses opportunities to reuse components, introduces unnecessary complexity, and violates architectural boundaries.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reuse check: identify shared components, utilities, and patterns that could be extracted.
  • Architecture boundary check: detect cross-module imports and potential boundary violations.
  • Quality review: assess naming consistency, error handling, and code quality, with actionable suggestions.

Quick Start

Provide the changed files or commit range to begin a rapid triage of reuse, architecture, and quality.

Frequently Asked Questions about simplify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find reuse opportunities and prevent code duplication when reviewing diffs?▼

Code review for reuse opportunities analyzes diffs and staged changes to identify shared utilities and patterns. It evaluates architecture boundaries and naming consistency to prevent duplication, returning a structured report with actionable design improvements.

What is the best way to detect architecture boundary violations in code changes?▼

Detecting architecture boundary violations involves assessing cross-module imports across project commits. By evaluating related modules and shared utilities, the review process identifies potential boundary violations and returns a structured report for design improvements.

Can I assess error handling and naming consistency across a specific commit range?▼

Yes, you can assess error handling and naming consistency by providing a specific commit range. The review applies to the changed files to evaluate overall code quality and returns actionable suggestions within a structured report.

Does this code review process require any external dependencies or components?▼

No, this code review process requires no external dependencies or components. You simply provide the changed files or commit range to begin a rapid triage of reuse, architecture, and quality.

When do I need to run an automated quality check on my code changes?▼

You need an automated quality check when reviewing code changes becomes error-prone and time-consuming. Running it on diffs and staged changes helps catch missed component reuse, unnecessary complexity, and architectural boundary violations.