signalproof-grill

Use decision-tree interviewing that builds a tree from your stated objective and asks only questions whose prerequisites are already resolved. Each round surfaces assumptions, contradictions, and tradeoffs, and the session ends when the decision frontier is empty or remaining branches are explicitly deferred.

A decision frontier is the set of questions whose prerequisite decisions are already resolved, making them answerable right now. The frontier is recomputed after every round so you never face a question whose answer depends on an unresolved earlier decision.

Yes. When a question depends on a fact establishable from repository state, files, connected tools, runtime evidence, or accepted project records, that fact is established first with its source and uncertainty preserved. You are only asked questions that genuinely require owner judgment.

Avoid it when a consequential fact cannot be established and guessing would materially change the decision, or when the interview is being used to manufacture agreement rather than expose choices. It also stops if implementation begins before shared understanding is confirmed.

No. The interview never converts into execution authority. After completion it routes to planning, design, or documentation skills, and the human must confirm the resulting shared understanding before any implementation begins.