skills.rest
Si1w
Si1wCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

sereview

Evaluate a paper's research type and empirical grounding against SE standards.

Updated Mar 2, 2026
Search Tags:#software-engineering#peer-review#systematic-review#review-checklist#empirical-study#threats-to-validity
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Si1w/se-research-skills --skill sereview
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sereview
Source: https://github.com/Si1w/se-research-skills/tree/main/skills/sereview
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Si1w/se-research-skills --skill sereview

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

对论文终稿进行预审，模拟顶级 SE 会议审稿人的视角，检查论文的原创性、严谨性和逻辑一致性。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 识别论文研究类型并对照相关实证标准进行初步对比，帮助作者发现潜在的研究设计缺陷。
  • 读取并应用 references/ directory 中的通用标准与特定标准，生成可执行的审查要点和建议。
  • 逐步生成 review-checklist.md 和最终评审报告，确保审稿过程可追溯且可复现。

Quick Start

Upload the manuscript (PDF/TEX) and the AI will generate a structured review checklist and a reviewer-ready report.

Frequently Asked Questions about sereview

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I pre-review a software engineering paper before submission?▼

A systematic review for SE papers evaluates empirical grounding against relevant standards by identifying the research type. It generates a review checklist and assesses threats to validity to ensure rigor and logical consistency.

How do I check my empirical study for threats to validity?▼

Checking threats to validity in SE empirical studies involves applying method-specific standards from the references directory. This process identifies research design flaws and generates a report reflecting essential, desirable, and extraordinary attributes.

Can I use this systematic review checklist for any empirical study?▼

The systematic review checklist applies to software engineering empirical studies, reading general and method-specific standards from the references directory. It guides checklist generation and validity threats evaluation for the specific research type.

What format should the manuscript be in for peer review simulation?▼

The manuscript format for peer review simulation should be PDF or TEX. Uploading the document allows the system to process the content and generate a structured review-checklist.md alongside a reviewer-ready report.

Does the generated review report include detailed review checklists?▼

The generated review report includes a detailed review-checklist.md. It produces a reviewer-ready report reflecting essential, desirable, extraordinary attributes, and threats to validity to ensure a traceable and reproducible review process.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
WILLOSCARWILLOSCAR
497

claims-extractor

Extract claims, contributions, and assumptions with source traceability from plain-text manuscripts.

Community
Intermediate
Hjhnb-starHjhnb-star

evaluation-protocol-checker

Evaluate research paper evaluation protocols for validity and rigor.

Community
Advanced
JeanDiableJeanDiable
18

paper-triggered-survey

Anchor a literature survey on one paper and map its research landscape.

Community
Advanced
JIRBOYJIRBOY
1

paper

Draft, polish, and review academic papers with LaTeX manuscript generation.

Community
Advanced