What problem does it solve? A linked SuperGrok subscription is advertised as a separate usage pool while the FAQ describes whichever-has-more usage, and no one can tell which behavior is real. This Skill settles the contradiction with evidence by quoting both wordings verbatim and testing them against dated client reads, instead of relying on memory or assumed pool math. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Verbatim contradiction capture: Quotes the separate-pool claim and the whichever-has-more claim with sources and dates before any analysis begins. - Client-read reconciliation: Records allowance figures, usage consumed, pool labels, on-demand state, and rollover behavior exactly as rendered, then tests each wording's prediction against the observed figures. - Run-over-run diffing: Compares wording moves, figure moves, and verdict moves against the prior run, and names gaps with an owner and date. - Use Case: After a billing-page wording change, run the reconcile to determine whether the linked SuperGrok allowance actually pools separately, producing a dated markdown verdict with every figure traced to a quoted read. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to reconcile whether the linked SuperGrok allowance is a separate pool or shared, using fresh reads from the usage and billing pages.
