second-opinion

Runs an independent second-model review of a diff reconciled with the primary review.

Updated Dec 1, 2025

Search Tags:#quality assurance #code review #pull request #diff #second opinion #review reconciliation

One-click install

npx skills add https://github.com/manusco/wolfgang --skill second-opinion-manusco

Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: second-opinion
Source: https://github.com/manusco/wolfgang/tree/main/.cursor/skills/second-opinion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manusco/wolfgang --skill second-opinion-manusco

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Single-reviewer code reviews can miss defects or reflect one model's biases. This Skill obtains an independent second-model review of a diff and reconciles it with the primary review, giving you a more balanced assessment before merging. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Independent Review: Routes the /second-opinion command to a dedicated procedure that performs a second-model analysis of a diff. - Reconciliation: Combines the second opinion with the primary review so disagreements are surfaced rather than silently dropped. - Use Case: After generating a primary review of a pull request diff, invoke /second-opinion to have a separate model re-examine the changes and produce a reconciled verdict before merging. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run the second-opinion procedure on the current diff to get an independent review reconciled with the primary review.

Frequently Asked Questions about second-opinion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get a second opinion on a code review?▼

Invoke the /second-opinion command, which routes to the second-opinion procedure. It runs an independent second-model review of the diff and reconciles the findings with the primary review.

What does the second-opinion skill actually do?▼

It is a routing entry point that reads the second-opinion procedure definition and executes it exactly, following its Definition of Done. The procedure itself performs the independent review and reconciliation.

Does second-opinion replace the primary code review?▼

No. It supplements the primary review by adding an independent second-model perspective, then reconciles both sets of findings rather than discarding either one.

When should I not use a second-model review?▼

For trivial changes like typo fixes or formatting-only diffs, a second review adds little value. It is most useful for substantive logic changes where a single reviewer might miss defects.