scribe

Writes and revises research papers, technical documentation, and proposals with evidence-matched claims.

1|Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills --skill scribe-kridaydave
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scribe
Source: https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills/tree/main/scribe
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills --skill scribe-kridaydave

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Turning raw findings and rough drafts into publishable, rigorous prose is slow and error-prone — arguments get buried, claims outrun their evidence, and structure fights the reader. This Skill applies a disciplined research-writing workflow that restructures drafts, calibrates claim strength to evidence, and produces prose that survives peer review. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Document-type playbooks: Structured skeletons for IMRaD research papers, abstracts, literature reviews, grant proposals, whitepapers, READMEs, design docs, and specs. - Claim-evidence auditing: Flags assertions stronger than the supporting data, undefined terms, buried ledes, and citation inconsistencies before submission. - Audience adaptation: Restructures and re-tones a piece for different readers — reviewers, grant panels, engineers, or executives. - Use Case: Paste raw experiment results and ask for a results section — the output organizes findings by claim, reports numbers with matched verb strength, and flags any result the data does not support. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to write the results section from your experiment findings, or to tighten and restructure an existing draft abstract.

Frequently Asked Questions about scribe

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn experiment results into a paper results section?▼

Provide your raw findings and ask for a results section. The output organizes findings by claim rather than chronological order, reports numbers with appropriate statistical language, and withholds interpretation for the discussion section.

How to restructure a literature review that reads like a list?▼

A paper-by-paper summary is an annotated bibliography, not a review. The Skill reorganizes sources by theme or tension, synthesizes where studies converge or conflict, and ends at the research gap your work fills.

Can it write grant proposals and whitepapers, not just papers?▼

Yes. It includes playbooks for grant proposals (problem, gap, approach, feasibility, impact), whitepapers (executive summary first), technical reports, READMEs, design docs, and specs, each with its own structural skeleton.

Does it handle citation formatting for different styles?▼

It formats citations and references consistently to the target style such as APA, IEEE, or Chicago, and keeps notation and terminology consistent throughout. It never fabricates references and marks uncertain ones for verification.

What are the limitations of AI-assisted academic writing here?▼

The Skill will not invent findings, data, or citations, and refuses claims stronger than the evidence supports. You must supply real results and sources; it shapes and sharpens prose but does not generate research content from nothing.