roster-plan

Decompose validated project intake briefs into role-specific execution sub-briefs.

2|2|Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill roster-plan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: roster-plan
Source: https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster/tree/main/.opencode/skills/roster-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill roster-plan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the error-prone, inconsistent manual work of breaking down validated project intake briefs into structured, role-specific sub-briefs for coordinated AI agent teams, ensuring every pipeline participant works from aligned, complete instructions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Dual-Voice Analysis: Spawns two independent analysis passes to catch unverified assumptions, hidden risks, and edge cases missed in the original brief.
  • Automated Sub-Brief Generation: Produces ready-to-use implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates, scope boundaries, and risk assessments.
  • Built-In Human Validation: Includes a structured comprehension, clarification, and consistency-check quiz to catch plan flaws before execution begins.
  • Use Case: A software team using the Roster pipeline can use this Skill to turn a validated intake brief for a new payment processing feature into clear, role-specific instructions for their implementer, reviewer, and QA agents, reducing rework and misalignment.

Quick Start

Use the roster-plan skill to decompose your validated intake brief for the new user authentication feature into aligned sub-briefs for your agent pipeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about roster-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decompose a validated project brief into sub-briefs for AI agent pipelines?▼

Brief decomposition for AI agent pipelines is automated by generating role-specific implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates and risk assessments from validated intake briefs.

What is adversarial dual-voice analysis for software development pipeline planning?▼

Adversarial dual-voice analysis for pipeline planning spawns two independent analysis passes to catch unverified assumptions, hidden risks, and edge cases missed in the original project brief.

How do I add human validation gating to an AI agent orchestration workflow?▼

Human validation gating is added through a structured comprehension, clarification, and consistency-check quiz that catches pipeline plan flaws and unverified assumptions before execution begins.

Can I use roster-plan to generate sub-briefs outside the Roster pipeline framework?▼

The Skill is specifically designed for software development workflows using the Roster pipeline framework, applying adversarial analysis and structured artifact generation to ensure pipeline plans are complete and low-risk.

What's the best way to ensure QA and implementer agents work from aligned instructions?▼

Producing ready-to-use implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates and scope boundaries ensures every pipeline participant works from complete, coordinated instructions that match original brief requirements.